Skip to main content

Change Management & Behavioral Economics


Change Management is a pretty hot topic these days. You can't seem to be involved in any type of larger project without the discussion around change being put onto the table (and rightly so).


Our organizations are made up of large numbers of individuals, and when we look to make transformative change, we are impacting many different processes and workflows which in turn impact larger and larger numbers of employees.


Trending approaches today are heavily focused on communication. Basically get top level buy in, have that pushed down through each level of management, communicate changes, be transparent and try to make people feel "included" in the change (it is more complex then than that, feel free to Google to your heart's content for more information).


The challenge or question for me however, sits more on the initial assumption that people will accept change once they understand it and see the value of the change for the organization.


So then why is it so hard, if all we have to do is explain the change and make sure we are effectively communicating it?


My personal view on this is here:

People are not necessarily resistant to change, they just prefer comfort; but it is more comfortable to do what you know, knowing your status and how you fit in, than rationally accepting change for the organization.


An opportunity I see to improve the effectiveness of Change Management would be to adopt and integrate notions from psychology and behavioral economics, namely Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias


Endowment Effect: This bias occurs when we overvalue something that we own, regardless of its objective market value

Loss Aversion: The pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining

Status Quo Bias: People prefer things to stay the same by doing nothing or by sticking with a decision made previously 


For a change to happen within a person, we must find a way to demonstrate the gain is more than what they will lose (or perceive to lose), and it is necessary to demonstrate that their status quo is not better than what the proposed changed will bring.


Add to the potential for rapid success by coupling the concepts above with principles of today's marketing; if you can’t market a product to everyone, the idea that you can’t be everything to everyone, the question is why then do we still treat organizational change with an “everyone” approach?

Everyone will most likely have to get on board at some point, so the end goal is correct, however trying to get everyone’s buy in all of them at the same time is flawed.

Check out this recent clip from Simon Sinek that frames this idea in a similar way:

Simon Sinek: Culture Change


Change management (and culture change) happens then from the smallest viable market (in the initial stages), building success stories and working with positive momentum. 

Kotter highlights the need for small wins. Focus on managing change in phases, utilizing "pilot" projects or departments where you find higher concentrations of your early adopters.


Please don't forget however that at the end of day, you are still dealing with people, and being able to connect or resonnate with them on an emotional level is required as well. The book "Heart of Change" does an excellent job highlighting strategies and considerations that organizations should take to personalize the change experience.

Next time you are responsible for leading change, consider these points and see how the outcomes change.service / plan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This 1 Thing Increases Your Career Capital More Than Anything Else

The Art of Better Decision Making Have you felt scared to make a decision? Maybe you get preoccupied with making the 'wrong' decision?  Did you know that 68% of people have admitted to not doing because they thought it would be harder than it actually is. Getting comfortable with making decisions is one of the biggest challenges new leaders face. You will be placed in situations where there isn't enough time to get all of the information. Or even harder, you will be placed in situations where you'll never get more information than what you have. The good news? Making better decisions is something that you can improve by being deliberate with your learning and how you choose to approach it. This is the approach I take to decision making. These have been test and is what I have used over my 15 year career to teach and develop teams. - Accept that you will make mistakes. There is rarely a perfect answer. Getting comfortable with ambiguity is a leadership muscle you need to

Your Next Five Moves

 There are two streams of thought when you start reading a book and you don't feel like you are connecting with it. Some people will say to stop reading it and move onto something else, the theory is that there are so many things in the world that you will enjoy reading, that you shouldn't be wasting your time on things that you don't. Camp B will tell you to stick with it, get through it and see what happens. If I had to "pick a side" I probably fall more into team B than team A, even though I do feel that there will always be some books / material that you should just put down. What has me more B than A? Some of the books that have had the most impact on me were a STRUGGLE to get through. I challenge that this may because they are pushing your boundaries and putting something up against your current worldview / paradigms. True growth and learning comes from when you can challenge and dismantle your own ideas, and rebuilt them anew. My first real experience with

Decisions, Positions and Frames

  Making decisions and getting consensus is the most common activity that every person goes through. Whether in your personal or professional life, we are all selling, all the time. Selling? I'm not selling anything! Actually, that's not really true. At the most fundamental level, selling is about the transfer of belief. You are trying to get a person or a group to see things the way you do. If they accept that, you make the "sale" (i.e. you have transferred your idea/belief) as another has chosen to accept it. Where things get hard is when people hold onto certain ideas, frames or positions around a circumstance. It's interesting how little people realize what they share related to their position without even knowing it. The information is there, as long as you are listening. Always be listening. When someone repeats a variable or constraint that is a difference, that has major impact. They themselves they may not realize that they are essentially confirming what