Skip to main content

Change Management & Behavioral Economics


Change Management is a pretty hot topic these days. You can't seem to be involved in any type of larger project without the discussion around change being put onto the table (and rightly so).


Our organizations are made up of large numbers of individuals, and when we look to make transformative change, we are impacting many different processes and workflows which in turn impact larger and larger numbers of employees.


Trending approaches today are heavily focused on communication. Basically get top level buy in, have that pushed down through each level of management, communicate changes, be transparent and try to make people feel "included" in the change (it is more complex then than that, feel free to Google to your heart's content for more information).


The challenge or question for me however, sits more on the initial assumption that people will accept change once they understand it and see the value of the change for the organization.


So then why is it so hard, if all we have to do is explain the change and make sure we are effectively communicating it?


My personal view on this is here:

People are not necessarily resistant to change, they just prefer comfort; but it is more comfortable to do what you know, knowing your status and how you fit in, than rationally accepting change for the organization.


An opportunity I see to improve the effectiveness of Change Management would be to adopt and integrate notions from psychology and behavioral economics, namely Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias


Endowment Effect: This bias occurs when we overvalue something that we own, regardless of its objective market value

Loss Aversion: The pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining

Status Quo Bias: People prefer things to stay the same by doing nothing or by sticking with a decision made previously 


For a change to happen within a person, we must find a way to demonstrate the gain is more than what they will lose (or perceive to lose), and it is necessary to demonstrate that their status quo is not better than what the proposed changed will bring.


Add to the potential for rapid success by coupling the concepts above with principles of today's marketing; if you can’t market a product to everyone, the idea that you can’t be everything to everyone, the question is why then do we still treat organizational change with an “everyone” approach?

Everyone will most likely have to get on board at some point, so the end goal is correct, however trying to get everyone’s buy in all of them at the same time is flawed.

Check out this recent clip from Simon Sinek that frames this idea in a similar way:

Simon Sinek: Culture Change


Change management (and culture change) happens then from the smallest viable market (in the initial stages), building success stories and working with positive momentum. 

Kotter highlights the need for small wins. Focus on managing change in phases, utilizing "pilot" projects or departments where you find higher concentrations of your early adopters.


Please don't forget however that at the end of day, you are still dealing with people, and being able to connect or resonnate with them on an emotional level is required as well. The book "Heart of Change" does an excellent job highlighting strategies and considerations that organizations should take to personalize the change experience.

Next time you are responsible for leading change, consider these points and see how the outcomes change.service / plan
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give your best stuff away

    This is an interesting and sometimes polarizing topic. One group of people believe that the more content (ideas, conversations, posts, videos, etc) that you put out into the world, the better your return is as you are connecting with more people and getting greater exposure. Another group feels that by investing all of this energy into giving away "free stuff", takes away from what you could be doing to grow your business, give to your clients or to your employer. That giving your stuff away doesn't pay the bills, so what's really the point other than feeling good. For me personally, I'm all about giving my best stuff away for free, and what follows are really my "whys". First and foremost, I don't really prescribe to the idea that anyone really has "best stuff". That's finite and fixed and I truly don't believe this applies to people the way it can be associated to things. If you are a miner, and you m...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Avoid the 'Quick Fix' Lure of Technology That's Stifling Your Creativity

  We live in a world that is obsessed with solving problems with a system or technology. How many times have you hear someone [basically] say "let's get an app for that"? Crazy. I'm all for shiny new things. I love my toys as much as you do.  Rarely however does that new systems, application or software suite fix any of the underlying issues. When was the last time you started using something new, either in your personal or professional life, and it immediately fixed your problem and you changed nothing about what you are doing. Often, what ends up happening, is that as businesses look to implement some new tech, they also end up having to change HOW they are doing things. The changes that are made to core processes is what drives the success. Using your phone to track your steps, your sleep, your workout or to even help you write. Pause for a second, think about any of those situations.  Tracking your steps and setting daily goals means that you are actually walking ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Delicate Dichotomy of “The Right Choice”

  The Best Decision Isn’t Always as Obvious as It Seems Your success at work is correlated to the quality of your relationships. Easy right? It’s common sense. You might even be wondering who doesn’t already know this. The challenge isn’t about attitude though. You’re right, nobody likes the as%ho^e — Don’t be that person. The challenge comes when you have to choose between being right or making the right choice. The Problem My team and I had been working on a large project that had been pushed back multiple times over the years. The market finally got to a point where the problem in the field had to be addressed. We dusted off our files and started looking at the information we had built 3 years prior. We made our plans for what needed to be refreshed and how we would go about it. We cut through the project quickly. The team had matured a lot in that time and those roadblocks from the past were mere pebbles on the road this time around. Cue the problem. The fundamental assumptions...
Post a Comment
Read more