Skip to main content

A Lost Art?

 


I had an interesting experience the other night that level me surprised and questioning some assumptions.

I saw an article on LinkedIn that was written to support route optimization and highlight differences between different types of final mile (last mile) deliveries.

As I went through it, I couldn't help but feel like it was a little off. Not that the information was wrong per se, more that the frame didn't quite capture all of the nuances I felt it should (I appreciate I am a touch opinionated - I prefer to call it passion).


It dawned on me later that evening, a question that might explain why I was feeling off after reading the article. In an on demand world, that is based on dynamic orders and routing, is knowledge being lost that supported the previous "traditional" models.


The major difference I am making between dynamic and traditional models is that traditional models are/were built on fixed and planned service schedules. This could be five deliveries per week, one, or something like once a month. The frequency itself isn't the focus, it's the fact that it is scheduled, fixed and repeating.

Today's eCommerce driven world is dynamic. People are making orders all the time, deliveries are based on the number of days from order to fulfilment versus a fixed schedule (i.e. Amazon's 2 day shipping).

In both environments, you get all types of data about your activity. At the most basic level, all of the same variables apply and impact in the same way. The differentiator is that in a dynamic model you never know exactly what you will have to delivery, how much or where.

Dynamic routing today is supported with a multitude of software suites. All the orders that come in will move through the system, they are dispatch and optimized by the algorithm. You find out how many runs/routes you need, this would then translate to hours, number of drivers, helpers, etc.

Since everything moves so fast, I challenge that something is lost in the overall approach to the business.


One of the most irritating things I deal with on a regular basis is someone who thinks that logistics is anything more than managing time and capacity. No matter if you are delivering widgets, food or items from that new direct to consumer retailer, it's all the same at the base. People that have only lived in the eCommerce space will tell you that it's special, different, you have to gain experience doing it in order to optimize and win.

Aboslutely. False.

Anyone who says that is showing how little they truly understand about operations, execution and the fundamentals of network design.


For those of us that that have grown up and experienced more traditional models, I find that we consider more. We have worked with systems that repeated, that gave us a regular and consistent sandbox to play in. This is like a pure opportunity of the scientific method. Same (or very similar variables), over and over again and you get to tweak inputs and see the results.

From this experience, I suggest that this type of experience makes you more effective when dealing with new types of delivery elements because you have a breadth and wealth of knowledge from proven experimentation that you can use to improve results.


You obviously have to grow, change and adapt. I am not suggesting that how we approach dynamic routing today doesn't make sense, it does. I do believe pairing modern day options with core fundamental understanding developed from experimentation yields more than simply relying on the software to give you the 'best' solutions.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This 1 Thing Increases Your Career Capital More Than Anything Else

The Art of Better Decision Making Have you felt scared to make a decision? Maybe you get preoccupied with making the 'wrong' decision?  Did you know that 68% of people have admitted to not doing because they thought it would be harder than it actually is. Getting comfortable with making decisions is one of the biggest challenges new leaders face. You will be placed in situations where there isn't enough time to get all of the information. Or even harder, you will be placed in situations where you'll never get more information than what you have. The good news? Making better decisions is something that you can improve by being deliberate with your learning and how you choose to approach it. This is the approach I take to decision making. These have been test and is what I have used over my 15 year career to teach and develop teams. - Accept that you will make mistakes. There is rarely a perfect answer. Getting comfortable with ambiguity is a leadership muscle you need to...

Your Next Five Moves

 There are two streams of thought when you start reading a book and you don't feel like you are connecting with it. Some people will say to stop reading it and move onto something else, the theory is that there are so many things in the world that you will enjoy reading, that you shouldn't be wasting your time on things that you don't. Camp B will tell you to stick with it, get through it and see what happens. If I had to "pick a side" I probably fall more into team B than team A, even though I do feel that there will always be some books / material that you should just put down. What has me more B than A? Some of the books that have had the most impact on me were a STRUGGLE to get through. I challenge that this may because they are pushing your boundaries and putting something up against your current worldview / paradigms. True growth and learning comes from when you can challenge and dismantle your own ideas, and rebuilt them anew. My first real experience with ...

Decisions, Positions and Frames

  Making decisions and getting consensus is the most common activity that every person goes through. Whether in your personal or professional life, we are all selling, all the time. Selling? I'm not selling anything! Actually, that's not really true. At the most fundamental level, selling is about the transfer of belief. You are trying to get a person or a group to see things the way you do. If they accept that, you make the "sale" (i.e. you have transferred your idea/belief) as another has chosen to accept it. Where things get hard is when people hold onto certain ideas, frames or positions around a circumstance. It's interesting how little people realize what they share related to their position without even knowing it. The information is there, as long as you are listening. Always be listening. When someone repeats a variable or constraint that is a difference, that has major impact. They themselves they may not realize that they are essentially confirming what...