Skip to main content

Modern Day Philosophy?

 




A thought popped into my head the other day, and I haven't stopped thinking about it. 

Why is modern philosophy so weak?

That sounds full of judgement, clearly there are many modern day (and impactful) philosophers. A quick Google search this morning easily gave me a list of the top 50 living philosophers. Being able to generate a list of 50 people in 2 seconds seems to blow up my comment rather quickly.


What is philosophy then?

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind and language. The questions are often posed as problems to be studied and resolved.


With academic philosophy healthy and strong, I started to wonder where my feeling and original question came from. I am now considering that it is not modern philosophy that is weak, the reality is it handles more complexity and nuance in the topics it explores than every before, rather it is the general importance and interest it has with the general population that has changed.

Think about yourself for minute, the last thirty, sixty days. Issues that have been on your mind, problems that you are struggling with, positions you are holding at work on in your personal life. Have you leveraged a philisophical approach (questioning, critical discussion, rational argument, and presentation) when exploring these questions and frames?

Or has your default been more to text a friend to bitch about something?

And yes, I put "text" there purposefully as we seem to prefer methods of communication that allow us to communicate while not being fully present or focusing our attention to the activity.


Even my Google expedition this morning into modern philosophy highlighted another intresting question for deeper exploration; the immdiate first level results didn't return any person's work that has been popularized in the last 20-30 years. The modern day bigs all have been born between 1940 and 1960. While not old, they are a couple of steps removed from succedding generations.

Current Western culture is riddled with impatience. People today are (or have convinced themselves) too busy to engage in a lot of critical thought and discussion. We are happy to be a cog in the machine while we try to build ourselves up via social media. With people feeling like they don't have time to sit and think, to work with the core of a situation or take a good look at their own choices and beliefs to question whether or not their actions will yield the results that they are after.


This focus on immediacy when we want an answer, when we want something for oursleves circles back to how we think; more specifically that we no longer really take the time to really think, we are impatient even with ourselves!

Ancient Greece wasn't filled with genius intellect across the base of its population, that's not why there is such a strong tie to philosophy when most people heard the word. I offer that what they did have and what is much different than where we are now, was a pure appreciation and desire for knowledge. They thrived being able to question and challenge, to take ideas and upend them, to look at things from different perspectives and not being slaves to "the right answer".

Today most people would rather spend time on Tik Tok, Instagram FaceBook or Twitter, endlessly scorlling social media for inspiration and to find that quick fix for life rather than asking real questions and seeing where that leads.


Not challenging yourself is comfortabe, and as a species we prefer comfort. Being comfortable means that you are in a particular mindset and environment - probably one you like. 

Just like the Galapagos Islands show us, nothing changes if conditions stay the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This 1 Thing Increases Your Career Capital More Than Anything Else

The Art of Better Decision Making Have you felt scared to make a decision? Maybe you get preoccupied with making the 'wrong' decision?  Did you know that 68% of people have admitted to not doing because they thought it would be harder than it actually is. Getting comfortable with making decisions is one of the biggest challenges new leaders face. You will be placed in situations where there isn't enough time to get all of the information. Or even harder, you will be placed in situations where you'll never get more information than what you have. The good news? Making better decisions is something that you can improve by being deliberate with your learning and how you choose to approach it. This is the approach I take to decision making. These have been test and is what I have used over my 15 year career to teach and develop teams. - Accept that you will make mistakes. There is rarely a perfect answer. Getting comfortable with ambiguity is a leadership muscle you need to

Grace Under Fire

  Leadership is not a title, and it is not only something reserved for your professional life. One thing that has greatly helped me over the years is finding what is the same rather than focusing on why situations are different. There will always be differences and nuance with whatever you are dealing with, I challenge however, that there is more that is similar or relatable to something else than what is different. True leadership is about how you react, how you handle the circumstances in front of you. True leadership is also how you carry it. For every decision, position or action that you see publically, there are two to four times more that most people never see. Professionally or personally we all carry a lot, we are all going through something all the time. Being a leader means that you have to do more. It is your responsibility to still take care of your team, your peers, your friends, your family. You have to be a guiding light, a steady hand, a source of confidence and comfor

Ego

   Ego is one of the hardest things to deal with as a new manager. You are in a new situation, you are most likely leading people for the first time, you are probably a bit younger ... and you just feel like you HAVE to prove yourself. This kinda makes sense right? You were obviously promoted because you knew your stuff and were really good at your old job, so now it MUST be your job to make sure everyone knows how good you are. WRONG! This is the number one mistake most new managers make. I totally get why, we have created this hierarchy in our corporate structures that makes people believe a good supervisor = a good manager = a good director = a good VP. This. Is. Completely. Untrue. The reality is that it takes different skills to be a good leader; and excellence at one level does not automatically mean excellence at the next. To be a good leader, you have to always be trying to check your ego. Yes you are smart, you probably have good ideas, you p