Skip to main content

Modern Day Philosophy?

 




A thought popped into my head the other day, and I haven't stopped thinking about it. 

Why is modern philosophy so weak?

That sounds full of judgement, clearly there are many modern day (and impactful) philosophers. A quick Google search this morning easily gave me a list of the top 50 living philosophers. Being able to generate a list of 50 people in 2 seconds seems to blow up my comment rather quickly.


What is philosophy then?

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind and language. The questions are often posed as problems to be studied and resolved.


With academic philosophy healthy and strong, I started to wonder where my feeling and original question came from. I am now considering that it is not modern philosophy that is weak, the reality is it handles more complexity and nuance in the topics it explores than every before, rather it is the general importance and interest it has with the general population that has changed.

Think about yourself for minute, the last thirty, sixty days. Issues that have been on your mind, problems that you are struggling with, positions you are holding at work on in your personal life. Have you leveraged a philisophical approach (questioning, critical discussion, rational argument, and presentation) when exploring these questions and frames?

Or has your default been more to text a friend to bitch about something?

And yes, I put "text" there purposefully as we seem to prefer methods of communication that allow us to communicate while not being fully present or focusing our attention to the activity.


Even my Google expedition this morning into modern philosophy highlighted another intresting question for deeper exploration; the immdiate first level results didn't return any person's work that has been popularized in the last 20-30 years. The modern day bigs all have been born between 1940 and 1960. While not old, they are a couple of steps removed from succedding generations.

Current Western culture is riddled with impatience. People today are (or have convinced themselves) too busy to engage in a lot of critical thought and discussion. We are happy to be a cog in the machine while we try to build ourselves up via social media. With people feeling like they don't have time to sit and think, to work with the core of a situation or take a good look at their own choices and beliefs to question whether or not their actions will yield the results that they are after.


This focus on immediacy when we want an answer, when we want something for oursleves circles back to how we think; more specifically that we no longer really take the time to really think, we are impatient even with ourselves!

Ancient Greece wasn't filled with genius intellect across the base of its population, that's not why there is such a strong tie to philosophy when most people heard the word. I offer that what they did have and what is much different than where we are now, was a pure appreciation and desire for knowledge. They thrived being able to question and challenge, to take ideas and upend them, to look at things from different perspectives and not being slaves to "the right answer".

Today most people would rather spend time on Tik Tok, Instagram FaceBook or Twitter, endlessly scorlling social media for inspiration and to find that quick fix for life rather than asking real questions and seeing where that leads.


Not challenging yourself is comfortabe, and as a species we prefer comfort. Being comfortable means that you are in a particular mindset and environment - probably one you like. 

Just like the Galapagos Islands show us, nothing changes if conditions stay the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This 1 Thing Increases Your Career Capital More Than Anything Else

The Art of Better Decision Making Have you felt scared to make a decision? Maybe you get preoccupied with making the 'wrong' decision?  Did you know that 68% of people have admitted to not doing because they thought it would be harder than it actually is. Getting comfortable with making decisions is one of the biggest challenges new leaders face. You will be placed in situations where there isn't enough time to get all of the information. Or even harder, you will be placed in situations where you'll never get more information than what you have. The good news? Making better decisions is something that you can improve by being deliberate with your learning and how you choose to approach it. This is the approach I take to decision making. These have been test and is what I have used over my 15 year career to teach and develop teams. - Accept that you will make mistakes. There is rarely a perfect answer. Getting comfortable with ambiguity is a leadership muscle you need to

Your Next Five Moves

 There are two streams of thought when you start reading a book and you don't feel like you are connecting with it. Some people will say to stop reading it and move onto something else, the theory is that there are so many things in the world that you will enjoy reading, that you shouldn't be wasting your time on things that you don't. Camp B will tell you to stick with it, get through it and see what happens. If I had to "pick a side" I probably fall more into team B than team A, even though I do feel that there will always be some books / material that you should just put down. What has me more B than A? Some of the books that have had the most impact on me were a STRUGGLE to get through. I challenge that this may because they are pushing your boundaries and putting something up against your current worldview / paradigms. True growth and learning comes from when you can challenge and dismantle your own ideas, and rebuilt them anew. My first real experience with

Decisions, Positions and Frames

  Making decisions and getting consensus is the most common activity that every person goes through. Whether in your personal or professional life, we are all selling, all the time. Selling? I'm not selling anything! Actually, that's not really true. At the most fundamental level, selling is about the transfer of belief. You are trying to get a person or a group to see things the way you do. If they accept that, you make the "sale" (i.e. you have transferred your idea/belief) as another has chosen to accept it. Where things get hard is when people hold onto certain ideas, frames or positions around a circumstance. It's interesting how little people realize what they share related to their position without even knowing it. The information is there, as long as you are listening. Always be listening. When someone repeats a variable or constraint that is a difference, that has major impact. They themselves they may not realize that they are essentially confirming what